Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Congenital Unilateral Zygomatico-Maxillo-Mandibular Fusion.
J Craniofac Surg
; 30(6): 1764-1766, 2019 Sep.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30921067
2.
Three-dimensional Frankfort horizontal plane for 3D cephalometry: a comparative assessment of conventional versus novel landmarks and horizontal planes.
Eur J Orthod
; 40(3): 239-248, 2018 05 25.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29016738
3.
Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Septa for Implant Placement.
Med Sci Monit
; 23: 1394-1400, 2017 Mar 21.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28323814
4.
OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE IN DENTISTRY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care
; 33(4): 487-493, 2017 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28857016
5.
Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a "Low-Cost" 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer.
Med Sci Monit
; 22: 943-57, 2016 Mar 22.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27003456
6.
A new mandible-specific landmark reference system for three-dimensional cephalometry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Eur J Orthod
; 38(6): 563-568, 2016 Dec.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26683131
7.
Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Implant Positioning in the Maxillary Sinus Septum: A Retrospective Study.
Med Sci Monit
; 21: 2666-71, 2015 Sep 08.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26363865
8.
Three-Dimensional Eyeball and Orbit Volume Modification After LeFort III Midface Distraction.
J Craniofac Surg
; 26(5): 1652-5, 2015 Jul.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26086925
9.
Three-dimensional surgical guide for frontal-nasal-ethmoid-vomer disjunction in Le Fort III osteotomy.
J Craniofac Surg
; 22(5): 1791-2, 2011 Sep.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21959434
10.
Intracerebral penetration of a zygomatic dental implant and consequent therapeutic dilemmas: case report.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
; 25(2): 416-8, 2010.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20369103
11.
The validity of in vivo tooth volume determinations from cone-beam computed tomography.
Angle Orthod
; 80(1): 160-6, 2010 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19852656
12.
Accuracy of digital dental models using the low-cost DAVID laser scanner.
Adv Clin Exp Med
; 28(12): 1647-1656, 2019 Dec.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31778603
13.
Towards an integrated system for planning and assisting maxillofacial orthognathic surgery.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed
; 91(1): 13-21, 2008 Jul.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18417245
14.
Validation of a windowing protocol for accurate in vivo tooth segmentation using i-CAT cone beam computed tomography.
Adv Clin Exp Med
; 27(7): 1001-1008, 2018 Jul.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29999253
15.
Validation of cone beam computed tomography-based tooth printing using different three-dimensional printing technologies.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
; 121(3): 307-15, 2016 Mar.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26868470
16.
Accuracy of three-dimensional, paper-based models generated using a low-cost, three-dimensional printer.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
; 42(8): 1847-52, 2014 Dec.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25176496
17.
Validity of 2D lateral cephalometry in orthodontics: a systematic review.
Prog Orthod
; 14: 31, 2013 Sep 20.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24325757
18.
Re: How accurate is model planning for orthognathic surgery? Sharifi A, Jones R, Ayoub A, Moos K, Walker F, Khambay B, McHugh S. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:1089-1093.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
; 38(9): 1009-10; author reply 1010, 2009 Sep.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19473817